Developing research and practice
Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement
Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project
F Davidoff and P Batalden
Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 319-325
[Full text]  [PDF]

Note from the Editor
The draft guidelines are designed to help with writing, reviewing, editing and using reports of improvement work. We invite colleagues to voice their opinions regarding this draft.

Commentary June 2006
Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back
P Pronovost and R Wachter
Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 152-153.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]

Commentary June 2006
Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care
G R Baker
Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 150-151.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]

Commentary April 2006
Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: an integral part of quality improvement scholarship
M H Chin and A T Chien
Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 79-80.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]

Editorial October 2005
Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
D P Stevens
Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 314.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]

Quality Lines October 2005
Qual Saf Health Care 2005 14: 314.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]

Commentary October 2005
Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine
D M Berwick
Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 315-316.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]

Commentary October 2005
Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement?
R G Thomson
Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 317-318.
[Full text] [PDF] [Submit a Response]