Quality and Safety in Health Care 2008;17:1
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Quality lines
David P Stevens, Editor-in-Chief
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation
This series of four articles provides a valuable and timely analysis of methodology for evaluating interventions to improve patient safety and healthcare quality improvement. The first article emphasises the important role for strategic analysis of previous research to maximise the chances of success. It borrows from Donabedian to describe a "causal chain" that explores how an intervention might affect an organisations processes and health outcomes. The second article focuses on study design and makes the often-overlooked point that the salient intra-class correlations in cluster studies are smaller with before and after designs than with cross-sectional designs. The authors explore in depth the stepped wedge, a valuable controlled before-and-after design. The third article examines study end points. The causal chain is revisited to argue that end points should be measured at all levels: beyond the level of the intervention for effectiveness, at the level of the intervention for fidelity, and proximal . . . [Full text of this article]
Related Articles
-
Mountains in the clouds: patient safety research
- David W Bates
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 156-157.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1. Conceptualising and developing interventions
- C Brown, T Hofer, A Johal, R Thomson, J Nicholl, B D Franklin, and R J Lilford
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 158-162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design
- C Brown, T Hofer, A Johal, R Thomson, J Nicholl, B D Franklin, and R J Lilford
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 163-169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement
- C Brown, T Hofer, A Johal, R Thomson, J Nicholl, B D Franklin, and R J Lilford
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 170-177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 4. One size does not fit all
- C Brown, T Hofer, A Johal, R Thomson, J Nicholl, B D Franklin, and R J Lilford
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 178-181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires
- J L Campbell, S H Richards, A Dickens, M Greco, A Narayanan, and S Brearley
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 187-193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review
- E N de Vries, M A Ramrattan, S M Smorenburg, D J Gouma, and M A Boermeester
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 216-223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON IMPROVING QUALITY AND VALUE IN HEALTHCARE, ORLANDO, FLORIDA, USA, 10 DECEMBER 2007
Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008 17: 224-232.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online ¦ Website terms and conditions ¦ Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.