HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Hogan, H Articles by Thomson, R PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hogan, H Articles by Thomson, R

What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management?

¹ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
² Imperial College, London, UK
³ National Patient Safety Agency, London, UK
⁴ Whitecot Consultancy Ltd, London, UK
⁵ North West London Hospitals Trust, London, UK
⁶ European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr H Hogan, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; helen.hogan{at}lshtm.ac.uk

ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the utility of data already existing within hospitals for monitoring patient safety.

Setting: An acute hospital in southern England.

Design: Mapping of data sources proposed by staff as potentially able to identify patient safety issues followed by an in-depth analysis of the content of seven key sources.

Data source analysis: For each data source: scope and depth of content in relation to patient safety, number and type of patient safety incidents identified, degree of overlap with incidents identified by different sources, levels of patient harm associated with incidents.

Results: A wide range of data sources existing within the hospital setting have the potential to provide information about patient safety incidents. Poor quality of coding, delays in reports reaching databases, the narrow focus of some data sources, limited data-collection periods and lack of central collation of findings were some of the barriers to making the best use of routine data sources for monitoring patient safety. An in-depth analysis of seven key data sources (Clinical Incident database, Health and Safety Incident database, Complaints database, Claims database and Inquest database, the Patient Administration System and case notes) indicated that case notes have the potential to identify the largest number of incidents and provide the richest source of information on such incidents. The seven data sources identified different types of incidents with differing levels of patient harm. There was little overlap between the incidents identified by different sources.

Conclusion: Despite issues related to the quality of coding, depth of information available and accessibility, triangulating information from more than one source can identify a broader range of incidents and provide additional information related to professional groups involved, types of patients affected and important contributory factors. Such an approach can provide a focus for further work and ultimately contributes to the identification of appropriate interventions that improve patient safety.